EMDR for Kids Through Lens of Somatic and Attachment- Required Evaluation

Program Objective 1 was met: Identify key considerations when using EMDR therapy with children.

Strongly Disagree 12345 Strongly Agree

Objective 2 was met: Describe developmentally appropriate approaches to EMDR preparation and early-phase treatment with pediatric clients.

Strongly Disagree 12345 Strongly Agree

Accuracy and utility of content were discussed

Strongly Disagree 12345 Strongly Agree

Content was appropriate for postdoctoral level training

Strongly Disagree 12345 Strongly Agree

Instruction at a level appropriate to postdoctoral level training

Strongly Disagree 12345 Strongly Agree

Teaching methods were effective

Strongly Disagree 12345 Strongly Agree

Instructor knew the subject matter

Strongly Disagree 12345 Strongly Agree

Instructor presented content effectively (e.g., promoted deep reasoning and learning; included a consideration of obstacles or anomalies)

Strongly Disagree 12345 Strongly Agree

Instructor elaborated upon the stated objectives

Strongly Disagree 12345 Strongly Agree

Instructor maintained my interest

Strongly Disagree 12345 Strongly Agree

Instructor used appropriate examples

Strongly Disagree 12345 Strongly Agree

Instructor provided a variety of applied examples (e.g., case presentations)

Strongly Disagree 12345 Strongly Agree

Organization made clearly evident, prior to registration: Requirements for successful completion of activity

YESNO

Organization made clearly evident, prior to registration: Commercial support for CE program, sponsor, or instructor (or any other relationship that could reasonably be construed as a conflict of interest)

YESNO

Organization made clearly evident, prior to registration, the following: Commercial support for content of instruction (e.g., research grants funding research findings etc.) that could be construed as a conflict of interest

YESNO

Organization made clearly evident, prior to registration, the following: Commercial support or benefit for endorsement of products (e.g., books, training, drugs, etc.)

YESNO

Organization made clearly evident, prior to registration, the following: Accuracy and utility of the materials presented, the basis of such statements, the limitations of the content being taught and the severe and most common risks

YESNO

Program materials were easily accessible

Strongly Disagree 12345 Strongly Agree

Special needs were met

Strongly Disagree 12345 Strongly Agree

Virtual meeting technology was adequate

Strongly Disagree 12345 Strongly Agree

Information could be applied to my practice or other work context.

Strongly Disagree 12345 Strongly Agree

Information contributes to achieving personal or professional goals.

Strongly Disagree 12345 Strongly Agree

Issues of diversity were addressed.

Strongly Disagree 12345 Strongly Agree

How much did you learn as a result of this CE program?

Very Little 12345 A Great Deal

How useful was the content of this CE program for your practice or other professional development?

Not Useful 12345Extremely Useful

This program enhanced my professional expertise

YESNO

I would recommend this program to others

YESNO

Teaching methods and tools focused on how to apply program content to my practice/work environment.

Strongly Disagree 12345 Strongly Agree

Learning was enhanced through a variety of media utilizing auditory, visual, and multimedia formats

Strongly Disagree 12345 Strongly Agree

The presentation facilitated the integration and synthesis of information

Strongly Disagree 12345 Strongly Agree

Please note your profession and status (Check all that apply)

Psychologist

Correct Incorrect Correct answer

Masters Level Licensed Therapist

Correct Incorrect Correct answer

Social Worker

Correct Incorrect Correct answer

Student

Correct Incorrect Correct answer

Administrator

Correct Incorrect Correct answer

Other

Correct Incorrect Correct answer

What was your overall impression of the activity? What went well? What could have been improved?

This response will be reviewed and graded after submission.

What did you learn that was new or different? How and/or will this information change how you practice?

This response will be awarded full points automatically, but it will be reviewed and possibly adjusted after submission.

What topics or presenters would you like to see at future CE presentations?

This response will be reviewed and graded after submission.

Other comments

This response will be reviewed and graded after submission.

EMDR for Kids Through Lens of Somatic and Attachment- Required Evaluation

Quiz Summary

Information

Results

Results

Categories

1. Question

Program Objective 1 was met: Identify key considerations when using EMDR therapy with children.

2. Question

Objective 2 was met: Describe developmentally appropriate approaches to EMDR preparation and early-phase treatment with pediatric clients.

3. Question

Accuracy and utility of content were discussed

4. Question

Content was appropriate for postdoctoral level training

5. Question

Instruction at a level appropriate to postdoctoral level training

6. Question

Teaching methods were effective

7. Question

Instructor knew the subject matter

8. Question

Instructor presented content effectively (e.g., promoted deep reasoning and learning; included a consideration of obstacles or anomalies)

9. Question

Instructor elaborated upon the stated objectives

10. Question

Instructor maintained my interest

11. Question

Instructor used appropriate examples

12. Question

Instructor provided a variety of applied examples (e.g., case presentations)

13. Question

Organization made clearly evident, prior to registration: Requirements for successful completion of activity

14. Question

Organization made clearly evident, prior to registration: Commercial support for CE program, sponsor, or instructor (or any other relationship that could reasonably be construed as a conflict of interest)

15. Question

Organization made clearly evident, prior to registration, the following: Commercial support for content of instruction (e.g., research grants funding research findings etc.) that could be construed as a conflict of interest

16. Question

Organization made clearly evident, prior to registration, the following: Commercial support or benefit for endorsement of products (e.g., books, training, drugs, etc.)

17. Question

Organization made clearly evident, prior to registration, the following: Accuracy and utility of the materials presented, the basis of such statements, the limitations of the content being taught and the severe and most common risks

18. Question

Program materials were easily accessible

19. Question

Special needs were met

20. Question

Virtual meeting technology was adequate

21. Question

Information could be applied to my practice or other work context.

22. Question

Information contributes to achieving personal or professional goals.

23. Question

Issues of diversity were addressed.

24. Question

How much did you learn as a result of this CE program?

25. Question

How useful was the content of this CE program for your practice or other professional development?

26. Question

This program enhanced my professional expertise

27. Question

I would recommend this program to others

28. Question

Teaching methods and tools focused on how to apply program content to my practice/work environment.

29. Question

Learning was enhanced through a variety of media utilizing auditory, visual, and multimedia formats

30. Question

The presentation facilitated the integration and synthesis of information

31. Question

Please note your profession and status (Check all that apply)

32. Question

What was your overall impression of the activity? What went well? What could have been improved?

33. Question

What did you learn that was new or different? How and/or will this information change how you practice?

34. Question

What topics or presenters would you like to see at future CE presentations?

35. Question

Other comments